Archive for March, 2008

Is the County Planning Board psychic?

sorcerer.jpg

How did they do it? How did the Baltimore County Planning Board manage to recommend an entire school addition — without speaking to anyone at the school! This is truly amazing. So many urban planners today get caught up in “fact finding,” studying “better alternatives,” and gathering “community input.”

But not our Planning Board.

In a March 21, 2008 letter to the county’s Office of Budget and Finance, Planning Director Pat Keller recommends “Full funding and rapid implementation of a Ridge-Ruxton Elementary School addition.” This, despite the fact that no one from the Planning Board had spoken to the school administration, staff or parents there. Nor had anyone at the Planning Board consulted with other community leaders, who have made numerous suggestions for more sensible ways to solve our overcrowding problem.

Imagine that. A Planning Board with an amazing ability to read the minds of hundreds, if not thousands, of people. Think of the money the county must be saving on doing actual research.

The only thing we can’t figure out is…how did the County Executive arrive at the exact same conclusion as the Planning Board a week before the Planning Board wrote its letter to the county’s Office of Budget and Finance? After all, the Planning Board is supposed to be recommending its plans to the county executive, not the other way around.

Wait! Is the county executive psychic too?

Read the possibly supernatural Planning Board letter here: plan-bd-cap-budg-080321.pdf

BALTIMORE SUN: SMITH PLAYING POLITICS WITH OUR CHILDREN

sun_icon.jpg

The Baltimore Sun today published an in-depth article in which school board members openly complain about the political pressure that County Executive Jim Smith has put on them to approve his poorly planned Ridge Ruxton School addition. Click here to read it.

In what reporter Gina Davis described as a “rare display of public candor,” the members said they were told if they didn’t vote for Smith’s plan, he wouldn’t fund another one. What’s more, Senator Jim Brochin told the Sun that several members confessed privately they were “threatened” with non-reappointment.

Smith’s spokesman, Don Mohler, called the charges “patently untrue.”

Perhaps the most telling part of the article came when Mr. Mohler claimed that his boss has an “excellent relationship” with the school board and Dr. Joe Hairston, the schools superintendent. “Hairston declined to comment,” the Sun wrote, putting it mildly.

So, just to put this in context, members of the Board of Education are now on the record accusing Jim Smith of political pressure. And the Baltimore County executive, through his spokesman, is calling them liars.

Who do you believe?

Towson Times: Political pressure put on school board

In a front-page story today, the Towson Times features comments from State Senator Jim Brochin and TFU chairperson Cathi Forbes.  They have both met separately with a number of Board of Education members who say the county executive’s office is pressuring them to approve the Ridge Ruxton addition. These board members, who wish to remain anonymous, have said they fear they won’t be reappointed unless they go along with the plan.

Click here to read the story.

And if what they’re doing bothers you, click here to write a letter to the editor of the Towson Times saying so.

TFU to meet with school activists around county

Since we began our effort to raise awareness of Towson’s overcrowding situation, we’ve heard from community activists throughout Baltimore County — people who’ve been fighting for more, or better, schools for many years. Later this week, we’ll be meeting with a number of them to explore strategies for working together. We share a common goal: To convince county government to think beyond what it is easy and what is cheap, and start doing what is right.

We appreciate the support we’ve received from all parts of the county, and hope that our collective muscle can achieve real results.

What’s going on? It’s a long story.

Since the Board of Education tabled the county executive’s poorly thought out proposal to build an addition at Ridge Ruxton School, we’ve been attempting to find out what happens next.

At its March 11 meeting, the Board said it needed more information about the plan — which was so vague it didn’t even mention Ridge Ruxton by name. (”Consultant Services – Architectural/Engineering (A/E) Services for Elementary School Addition,” was how it was worded on the Board’s agenda that night.) It also said it wanted to seek community input.

Yet no one from the Board, the school system, or the county executive’s office has scheduled a community input meeting. And, as we understand it, none of these offices has sent a single representative to speak with the administration or parents of Ridge Ruxton.

So last week, Towson Families United took it upon itself to provide some input. We had a meeting with Don Mohler, the county executive’s spokesman, to present our concerns about the plan. And to present some creative options that we continue to think merit consideration.

We told Mr. Mohler that we couldn’t support the 400-seat addition without assurances that it would include a second cafeteria, gymnasium, health suite, and other common areas. While Mr. Mohler told us at the meeting that it would, he has since retracted that statement. And he now says he agrees with school system officials, who argue (somewhat unbelievably) that it is the architects, not the school system, who will determine what is built. Isn’t that the tail wagging the dog?

It is our understanding that the Ridge Ruxton cafeteria currently seats 125 students, and lunch takes two full hours. It’s clear the existing cafeteria cannot accommodate 400 more students. In addition, the gym at Ridge Ruxton is in use all day for physical and occupational therapy needs, so again, another gym would be needed. And the health suite is already staffed with three full-time nurses who tend to the special needs of their medically fragile population.  Another health suite, to tend to sick children, would be required.  For all of these reasons, and more, the parents at Ridge Ruxton have come out strongly against the proposed addition.  And we stand with them.

We then presented Mr. Mohler with a number of other options that seem worthy of investigation. For instance:

We could follow the Board of Education’s recommendation to relocate the students at Ridge Ruxton to a new building in Mays Chapel, and re-open Ruxton Elementary.

We could move the Bykota senior center to another location — like on land owned by the YMCA, or even to Mays Chapel — and re-open Towson Elementary.

We could find another piece of land in Towson and build an “urban model” school that requires significantly less acreage. One of our members, an architect, is working on such a project in Washington, D.C. He’s designing an 850-student school on just 3.2 acres — far less than the county continues to insist upon.

All of our suggestions involve opening a complete, new school. That’s something the county executive has been reluctant to do since he took office. But it’s something we believe is vitally important to truly solve our overcrowding problem. An addition — at Ridge Ruxton, or elsewhere — will simply put too much strain on the existing school’s resources. Don’t forget: The county closed two elementary schools in Towson in the early 1980s when school-aged populations dropped. We simply want at least one of them back. Although if you look at the school system’s 10-year projections, it looks more like we need both of them back.

In any event, Mr. Mohler didn’t seem particularly interested in any of our suggestions. He basically said they all cost too much. Even though there’s no evidence anyone’s done the math.

The County’s Office of Planning, meanwhile, has weighed in. In a March 21, 2008 letter to the county’s Office of Budget and Finance, secretary Pat Keller lists the Ridge Ruxton addition as its No. 1 recommendation: “Full funding and rapid implementation of a Ridge-Ruxton Elementary School addition to begin to address the school overcrowding in the Towson area and along the York Road corridor. As well as providing additional seats, the addition should include expansion of the common areas.” Apparently these folks don’t have to wait to see what the architects say. You can read the entire letter below.

plan-bd-cap-budg-080321.pdf

So where does that leave us? Will the Board of Education get the information it so rightly deserves in order to make a decision? Will the county executive ignore the Board and build the addition anyway? Will anyone actually visit Ridge Ruxton?

We’ll continue to press for answers. Stay tuned.

That totals $473.3 million

Baltimore County officials, who have repeatedly said that tough economic times hamper their ability to open a complete new school in Towson, might take note of this article in today’s Baltimore Sun.

Gina Davis, the reporter who has been following our overcrowding issue, writes:

“The county reported a surplus of $81.4 million for fiscal 2007, $106 million for fiscal 2006 and $101 million for fiscal 2005. An estimate for fiscal 2008 is a surplus of $184.9 million, according to evidence in the fact-finder’s report.”

TFU joins TABCO in supporting school funding

The Teachers Association of Baltimore County launched its own website recently to address County Executive Jim Smith’s handling of our school system. Since he’s taken office, Mr. Smith has cut the county’s contribution to our public schools by 7.2%, according to TABCO.

We support TABCO’s goal of additional funding for our teachers and schools. Visit its new website here.

And click here to RSVP for a rally and march, April 1st, at 3 pm, in the courthouse plaza.

Smith to community: Tough luck

ABC2 News ran a story last night on County Executive Jim Smith’s response to the overcrowding situation in Towson, in particular a poorly thought out plan to build a 400-seat addition to the Ridge Ruxton School.  Despite reservations by the Board of Education, the Towson community and the parents at Ridge Ruxton (who say the plan may violate federal law), Smith wants to move forward with his plan.

“I do think the school system and I know the county is going to work together with them to address some of the concerns that were raised at the meeting,” he said.

Click here to read the text of the ABC2 News story.

Watch the best of the Board of Ed meeting here.

The March 11, 2008 Baltimore County Board of Education meeting was unusually contentious. County Executive Jim Smith had hoped the Board would rubber-stamp a vague, poorly thought out proposal to build a 400-seat addition to the special-needs Ridge Ruxton school. Not so fast, Mr. Smith.

First up is Laura Mullen, president of the Ridge Ruxton School PTA, whose members vehemently oppose the proposal. She says the addition may violate federal law.


Next, Maggie Kennedy, chairperson of the county’s Area Educational Advisory Councils, urges the Board to vote against the proposed addition. “I know that some of you are under intense political pressure to approve this plan,” she says.

Jan Thomas, chairperson of the Central Area Education Advisory Council, rounds out the testimony. She pointedly tells the board it’s their job to solve the overcrowding problem, and urges them to visit the affected schools before making any decisions.

And now for the courageous comments by a number of Board of Education members. Their first action was to pull the Ridge Ruxton proposal — referred to as item number 16 — out from other actions that would be voted on as a group. Then, one by one, they challenged the wisdom of the proposal, asked why an earlier plan involving Mays Chapel was killed, suggested that there were more choices that have to be considered, and ultimately, voted to table the plan until they heard from the community.

But will the county listen?

Kris from the Forge Flyer blog took this video of the various speakers at Thursday night’s Central Area Advisory Council hearing. Many excellent suggestions were offered.

“We need a new school!”

WJZ Channel 13 provided excellent coverage of our rally on its 11 p.m. newscast.

“Jim Smith doesn’t care about me”

Just one of the many comments heard on Fox 45’s News at 10 coverage tonight of the Towson Families United rally. Click below to watch.

What a turnout!

Thank you to all who attended tonight’s family rally. More than 250 of you came out to show your support for a new elementary school in Towson. Here are some pictures from the big event. By all accounts, it was a huge success. Everybody (but County Executive Jim Smith) showed up.

l1070404.jpgl1070422.jpgl1070413.jpgl1070417.jpgl1070421.jpgl1070419.jpgl1070405.jpg

 

Towson’s families unite. TONIGHT.

“Rally for Families”

Tonight. 6:45 p.m. sharp.

Meet in front parking lot of Rodgers Forge Elementary.

Bring your kids, their grandparents, and your neighbors.

Make a difference.

When it rains, it pours.

On top of all the other great media coverage our cause has gotten in the last 24 hours, the Baltimore Examiner also profiled TFU chairperson Cathi Forbes in the paper’s “3-minute interview” today. Click here to read it.