Archive for June, 2008

Smaller schools better for environment, too

mainimage.jpg

Today’s Baltimore Sun features two letters to the editor in response to the newspaper’s front-page article on a national trend toward smaller schools. Letter writer and Sierra Club member Chris Yoder makes the case that on top of improving academics, smaller schools are better for our planet:

Smaller schools would have smaller catchment areas that make it feasible for more students to walk or bike to school rather than be driven by their parents or by a school bus. And that would help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve students’ physical fitness.

Click here to read both letters.

SUN: County love affair with additions bucks national trend toward smaller schools

md_ts-1.jpg

In a front-page article today, the Baltimore Sun wrote about a national trend toward building smaller schools, and breaking up larger ones — a direction that Baltimore County has not generally taken in dealing with school overcrowding.

The county school board, which has authorized seven 400- to 600-seat additions on its high schools in the past decade, is only now beginning to realize the benefit of smaller schools, the article states.

Recent decisions by the school board to overrule County Executive James T. Smith’s latest plans for additions — at Loch Raven High School and at Ridge Ruxton School — are the first examples of a shift in thinking by some at the local level.

That thinking does not necessarily extend to the county executive’s office. Mr. Smith has said he supports additions because they cost less than building new schools.

Read the full Sun article here.

TFU TV: School Board stands up to Baltimore County Executive Jim Smith

On June 10, 2008, the Baltimore County Board of Education voted unanimously to rescind its earlier support for a 400-seat addition to Loch Raven High School. Baltimore County Executive James T. Smith had placed the addition into his budget last year without consulting the school system or school board.

Board members say they originally voted for the addition because, once again, they were told by the county executive’s office that they would receive nothing if they voted against the plan. The now-failed Loch Raven addition is the latest in a series of large additions that Mr. Smith has unilaterally proposed as cheaper alternatives to building new schools.

Many believe that this decision, as well as the vote last month to support a new elementary school in Towson — rather than Mr. Smith’s possibly illegal addition to Ridge Ruxton School — shows that the Board is finally emerging as a thoughtful and independent voice. Watch the Loch Raven decision below.

SUN COLUMNIST: Baltimore County Executive Jim Smith has lost. Again.

marabella.jpg

Baltimore Sun columnist Jean Marbella apparently wasn’t buying the attempts by County Executive James T. Smith to spin his failure at Loch Raven High School into something positive for himself. In an explosive column today, Ms. Marbella lays it out for the county executive. We feature her commentary below, in its entirety:

There’s a lot of “disappointment,” some of it “extreme,” in the Baltimore County executive’s office this week. County exec Jim Smith has allowed that he’s also “confused” and finds the situation “frustrating.”

It’s very discreet, even decorous language in the aftermath of a pitched battle that Smith lost - and one that could come back to haunt him in the future when the term-limited county executive makes what everyone expects will be a run for another office.

But then, this has been an odd fight all along.

When was the last time, for example, you saw parents sounding the alarm on overcrowded schools but rejecting Smith’s plan to … expand a school? Or a school board, having received some $16 million for that expansion, turn around and say … uh, never mind, no thanks? Or the state comptroller coming to town to support parents in their fight against Smith, who is said to be considering a run for … state comptroller?

As I said, odd, and it’s not over yet.

This week, the Baltimore County school board reversed itself on the 400-seat expansion of Loch Raven High School, which it had approved four months ago with Smith’s backing. (Or his pressure, as some board members have said.) But as opposition from community members and local legislators mounted, the school board changed its mind, giving a victory to those who feared that expanding Loch Raven would work against their goal of getting an entirely new high school built.

Coming on the heels of a similar victory in May, when the school board voted to build an elementary school in Towson instead of adding to existing schools as Smith initially favored, activists were cheered by their progress.

“It’s not easy to stand up to the county executive,” said David Marks, a Perry Hall resident who has been pushing for new school construction rather than additions to old ones.

Smith has argued that the current overcrowding in some high schools could have been solved by the expansion of Loch Raven, and that projections of future enrollments do not justify an entirely new high school.

Opponents dispute that, saying projections don’t include the influx of new students who will come with BRAC, the Base Realignment and Closure plan that is expected to bring thousands of new residents to the state. Additionally, they argue, making high schools bigger goes against the current thinking among some educators that smaller schools are more successful.

In any event, the school board’s decision to reject the proposal to expand Loch Raven doesn’t end the dispute. With neither the expansion nor a commitment to build a new high school, overcrowding remains - at Loch Raven, Perry Hall, Towson and other schools.

With Smith adamant that a new high school isn’t warranted, Marks said parents are basically going to be “running the clock” and looking toward working with whomever comes next - the county executive has only two more years in office because of term limits. “Most immediately,” Marks said, “we’ll be talking to folks running for county executive.”

There’s no guarantee that Smith’s successor will be someone who favors new construction. But the overcrowding issue has obviously ignited quite a storm. Parents say the county can’t continue renovating and expanding aging schools, and needs to commit to building new ones.

The cost of new schools is always cited, and, to be sure, the expense of building new schools is undeniable - although renovating and adding on to old ones are no bargain, either. Advocates say the county needs to address these funding issues and consider things such as impact fees that other counties levy on developers, which would go toward school construction.

With some schools straining at the seams - those “451″ signs that advocates have placed in windows refers to the total number of students over capacity at Rodgers Forge, Hampton, Stoneleigh and Riderwood elementary schools - the county is past due on addressing the problem. Good schools - and that means ones that aren’t so crowded that students are spilling out into portables - are vital to any area that wants to attract families and job-producing businesses.

Yes, schools are expensive to build, until you consider the cost of not building them.

DEPT. OF IRONY: Smith spends school money without asking school board

Ironically, it appears County Executive James T. Smith — already accused of making unilateral decisions on school projects — decided how to spend the $12 million allocated for his failed Loch Raven addition without asking the school board. Smith says he simply chose to fund a list of projects — mostly parking lot repairs and tennis court resurfacing — provided by the school system. But in doing so, he seems to have circumvented the Board of Education.

Laurie Taylor-Mitchell, who led the fight against the Loch Raven addition, is vigorously complaining that the $12 million might have been better spent on school air conditioning. Only half the schools in the county are air-conditioned, which means Mr. Smith’s county is tied for last in that regard.

Baltimore Sun reporter Gina Davis, who follows county schools, has a very interesting post on this subject here on the Sun’s education blog. Ms. Davis writes:

“I have a call into the school system officials to find out if it would have been an option for the school board — had they been consulted yesterday before Smith’s decision — to suggest using that freed up $12 million toward air conditioning projects in the coming year. Are there logistical or technical constraints? Is it as simple as, If only he had first asked the board what they wanted to do with the ‘found’ money?

Meantime, Mr. Smith seems intent on scoring political points with the Loch Raven money. He sent an an email to his mailing list in all seven county council districts today bragging about how pleased is to give money away to schools throughout the county. He writes, in part:

I have spoken with County Council members, and the County will reallocate those funds immediately, funding school projects in all seven council districts…Baltimore County will now reallocate the $12 million that was set aside for the Loch Raven addition creating a total of $14 million for school projects all around the Beltway.

Well, you can say one thing for Baltimore County schools. They may be crowded and un-air-conditioned, but they’re sure going to have some nice parking lots and tennis courts.

Some call it “finesse.” We call it “meddling.”

Well-known political columnist Barry Rascover recently speculated about County Executive James T. Smith’s future in this article from the June 4 Community Times. The county executive, Mr. Rascover wrote, demonstrated a good deal of “finesse” in his handling of Towson’s school overcrowding issue.

That was just too a little too much to swallow for TFU Vice-Chair Alyson Bonavoglia, who wrote this rather pointed response to Mr. Rascovar’s column:

Barry Rascovar’s interpretation of recent events relating to Towson schools overcrowding reads like a fantasy in which County Executive Jim Smith’s heavy-handed and thoughtless meddling in the school system’s business is interpreted as political finesse.

Rascovar states, “The school overcrowding issue illustrates Smith’s finesse. He pushed for the least expensive approach before he let the school board come up with its own solution, one that appeased most parents.”

Since when is it the county executive’s job to “push” for any school construction project?

Baltimore County Public Schools, the experts we pay to build and run our schools, had in the fall of 2007 presented a well-researched solution to Towson elementary schools’ overcrowding problem. This solution, to build a new special education school in Mays Chapel and convert the Ridge Ruxton School back to Ruxton Elementary School, was approved by the Board of Education and supported by the community. It died by Jim Smith’s hand.

The solution he offered was to build a 400-seat addition for elementary school students onto Ridge Ruxton, a special education school with 127 medically fragile students, 10 of whom can walk. Ridge Ruxton parents filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights on the grounds that the addition would violate their children’s rights to be educated in a public separate day school.

Here are more examples of Jim Smith’s finesse. The 2007 county auditor’s report revealed that Smith inserted school construction projects into the county budget, bypassing Baltimore County Public Schools.

Members of the Board of Education have been told by Smith that if they don’t vote for his pet school construction projects they will lose county money and their board seats.

Smith’s interference in school business has so bungled the county’s request for state school construction money that the director of the Interagency Committee on School Construction has said that his office would need to meet with school and county government officials this summer to explain the process for future funding requests, and that he would be carefully monitoring how the county spends the state money it has received for fiscal ’09 “to determine if the state’s funds have been used efficiently.”

This is not the kind of “finesse” Marylanders look for in a statewide officeholder.

Alyson Bonavoglia
Towson

Community activist speaks truth to power

logo.gif

Laurie Taylor-Mitchell, the community activist who led the charge against the 400-seat addition to Loch Raven High School, responds to the official statement of “disappointment” by County Executive James T. Smith.

Listen to her interview on WBAL Radio. Click here.

Smith “disappointed” over Board’s reversal

In statement released today, Baltimore County Executive James T. Smith said he is “extremely disappointed” that the Board of Education refused to approve his plan for a 400-seat addition to Loch Raven High School. The plan, which was placed into the county budget without knowledge of most school officials, originally received Board approval earlier this year. But upon further review, Board members said the county executive’s pattern of “warehousing” students in large additions around the Beltway has to stop somewhere.

The county executive said he will immediately allocate the approximately $12 million for the addition to smaller school projects throughout the county. Read the text of the county executive’s statement here.

SCHOOL BOARD REJECTS LOCH RAVEN PLAN; SAYS SMITH IS ‘WAREHOUSING’ STUDENTS

The Baltimore County Board of Education tonight officially changed its mind on County Executive James T. Smith’s proposed 400-seat addition to Loch Raven High School, voting the proposal down after approving it in February.

The Board said it was “rescinding” its support of the addition because it amounts to “warehousing” students, rather than educating them. They said it might be the most cost-effective solution, but not the wisest solution for Baltimore County.

“I believe when we enlarge any school we take a school where learning is happening and turn it into a warehouse,” said Board member Rodger Janssen.

Acknowledging that the Board was late in rejecting this proposal, Board President JoAnn Murphy paraphrased former Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, who once noted: “Wisdom too often never comes, and so one ought not to reject it merely because it comes late.”

Click here to read the Baltimore Sun recap of the meeting.

School Board poised to reject Loch Raven plan

The Baltimore County Board of Education is expected tonight to reconsider and reject its earlier approval of a controversial, 400-seat addition to Loch Raven High School, Towson Families United has been told.

The action would be the latest show of independence by a school board that has historically served at the behest of the Baltimore County executive.

The Board originally approved the Loch Raven plan in February, reportedly after County Executive James T. Smith told board members it was the only option he would fund.

But the Board is reconsidering that vote tonight, after strong community opposition and unusual scrutiny by the state Board of Public Works. The state recently tabled a decision on state funding for the project, pending further investigation.

Towson Families United has been told that tonight’s action would avoid an embarrassing meeting in Annapolis in a few weeks, when the Board of Public Works is expected to sharply question county and school system officials about the process behind the Loch Raven proposal.

For that reason, the county executive may in fact be relieved that the Board would reconsider the addition, as it might seem to be the board’s “fault” for approving the plan in the first place.

In fact, the decision to build an addition at Loch Raven was entirely the county executive’s. He thought of it, he told the school system about it, and he told the school board it was their only choice, according to school system officials and Board members.

Read more about tonight’s possible vote in this Baltimore Sun story, published today.

Sun column calls for “fresh thinking” on schools

In a well-reasoned and insightful column in today’s Baltimore Sun, county activists David Marks and Laurie Taylor-Mitchell suggest a five-point plan to reform Baltimore County Public Schools.

“The debate over whether to build an addition at Loch Raven High School is the culmination of nearly a decade of frustration with the way Baltimore County plans and builds its schools,” they write.

Click here to read the entire column.

BCPS: Don’t blame us. It was County Executive Jim Smith’s idea.

 

finger-point.jpgimages-11.jpeg

In perhaps the most candid comments made to date regarding the proposed, controversial Loch Raven High School addition, Baltimore County schools spokesperson Kara Calder has pointed the finger directly at County Executive James T. Smith, Jr.

“He first presented his project in April 2007,” Calder told the Towson Times in an article published today. Asked why the school board ultimately approved the addition, Calder said the board had no choice. “They did so rather than reject the money,” she told the newspaper. Presumably, that is the same reason that Calder’s boss, superintendent Joe Hairston, signed a joint letter with the county executive supporting the project.

Click here to read the article.